DDI description: Finnish National Election Study 2011: Telephone Interviews among Finnish-speaking Voters DDI-kuvailu: Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2011: suomenkieliset puhelinhaastattelut DDI-beskrivning: Riksdagsvalundersökning 2011: Telefonintervjuer bland finskspråkiga väljare 2673 Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish Social Science Data Archive Finnish National Election Study 2011: Telephone Interviews among Finnish-speaking Voters [codebook]. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [producer and distributor], 2012. Finnish Social Science Data Archive FSD FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records), jonka tekijä on Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finnish Social Science Data Archive), on lisensoitu Creative Commons Nimeä-Epäkaupallinen 1.0 Suomi lisenssillä. FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records) av Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finlands samhällsvetenskapliga dataarkiv) är licensierad under a Creative Commons Erkännande-IckeKommersiell 1.0 Finland License. FSD:n aineistokuvailut (FSD metadata records) by Suomen yhteiskuntatieteellinen tietoarkisto (Finnish Social Science Data Archive) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 1.0 Finland License. Finnish National Election Study 2011: Telephone Interviews among Finnish-speaking Voters Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2011: suomenkieliset puhelinhaastattelut Riksdagsvalundersökning 2011: Telefonintervjuer bland finskspråkiga väljare 2673 Grönlund, Kimmo Åbo Akademi University According to the agreement between FSD and the depositor. Finnish Social Science Data Archive Grönlund, Kimmo Individual datasets

Individual datasets contain those datasets that do not belong to any series.

 1.0 Grönlund, Kimmo: Finnish National Election Study 2011: Telephone Interviews among Finnish-speaking Voters [computer file]. FSD2673, version 1.0 (2012-02-01). Turku: Åbo Akademi University [producer], 2011. Tampere: Finnish Social Science Data Archive [distributor], 2012. constituencies language policy parliamentary candidates parliamentary elections political attitudes political participation political support voting political studies mass political behaviour, attitudes/opinion elections

This survey charted the political views of eligible voters in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections. The data were collected in both Finnish and Swedish. This dataset contains the interviews in Finnish (see FSD2726 for the data on Swedish-speaking population). Questions in the interview are for the most part the same in both datasets; the questions about language policy differ somewhat and there were added questions about language for Swedish-speakers. The data are also available in Swedish.

The respondents' interest in politics and frequency of discussing political and societal matters were first investigated. Views were probed on whether they felt closer to one political party than the others. The respondents were asked to what extent they agreed with several statements relating to Finnish politics and society (e.g. whether important national issues should be decided in a referendum more often and whether the second official language should be an obligatory subject at school).

Perceptions on the performance of the government and trust in different institutions and persons (e.g. the president, politicians, police) were examined. The final set of questions focused on the respondents' voting habits in the latest parliamentary elections. They were asked whether they had voted, when they had voted, to which party their candidate belonged, whether the party or candidate was more important when voting and how much certain reasons affected party choice.

Background variables included, among others, the respondent's gender, year of birth, highest level of education, religiosity, economic activity and occupational status, household composition, employment status, financial circumstances of family, language spoken at home, proficiency in Swedish, languages used in the neighbourhood, language spoken at work or studies, and region of residence (NUTS3).

 Finland Finland Individual Individual Finnish citizens who had the right to vote in the 2011 parliamentary elections the Åland Islands Quantitative Cross-sectional study CrossSection TNS Gallup

A random sample drawn from the Finnish Population Register. Sample size was five times the target number of interviews, both for the Finnish-speaking (FSD2673) and the Swedish-speaking (FSD2726) population. At the interview stage, gender, age and region of residence quotas were formed to achieve a representative sample.

 Telephone interview Structured questionnaire There is a weight variable [weight] in the data. FSD has no further information on the weight variable in the data. Detailed and specific data description in Finnish and English. Variable frequencies, filter variables, variable and value labels, and missing values are checked. If necessary, the data are anonymised. Finnish Social Science Data Archive Data: SPSS portable file. Data available also in other file formats. Access to the data granted for scientific and teaching purposes. FSD's access application procedure. The source must be acknowledged in any publication based wholly or in part on the data. The bibliographic citation may be in the form required by the publication, or in the form suggested by the archive. The archive must be informed of all publications where the data have been used. The depositor and the archive bear no responsibility for any results or interpretations arising from the secondary use of the data. FSD2726 Finnish National Election Study 2011: Telephone Interviews among Swedish-speaking Voters daF2673e.por 1001 68 SPSS Portable [fsd_no] FSD study number FSD study number 1001 2673 2673 2673.00 .000 [fsd_vr] FSD edition number FSD edition number 1001 1.0 1.0 1.000 .0000 [fsd_pro] FSD processing level FSD processing level 1001 1 1 1.00 .000 1 A (see codebook) 1001 2 B (see codebook) 0 3 C (dataset has not been checked at FSD) 0 [fsd_id] FSD case id FSD case id 1001 1 1001 501.00 289.108 [id] Case id Case id 1001 13 6493 2893.29 2052.267 [svuosi] Respondent's year of birth Respondent's year of birth 1001 1921 1993 1960.95 17.492 [sukup] Respondent's gender Respondent's gender 1001 1 2 1.48 .500 1 Female 521 2 Male 480 [k1] How interested are you in politics? How interested are you in politics? 1001 1 5 2.08 .822 1 Very interested 238 2 Somewhat interested 508 3 Not very interested 197 4 Not at all interested 55 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 3 [k2] Generally, that is, not only during elections, how often do you discuss political and social issues with people? Generally, that is, not only during elections, how often do you discuss political and social issues with people? 1001 1 6 2.60 1.089 1 Daily or almost daily 187 2 Often 279 3 Sometimes 321 4 Rarely 181 5 Never 31 6 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 2 [k3] Do you feel you are a little closer to one of the political parties than the others? Do you feel you are a little closer to one of the political parties than the others? 1001 1 3 1.37 .544 1 Yes 658 2 No 312 3 Can't say 31 [k4] (IF K3=YES) Do you feel you are a little closer to one of the political parties than the others? Which party? (IF K3=YES) Do you feel you are a little closer to one of the political parties than the others? Which party? 658 1 10 3.94 2.861 1 KOK (National Coalition Party) 143 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 112 3 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 124 4 PS (The Finns, prev. True Finns) 65 5 VIHR (Green League) 59 6 VAS (Left Alliance) 52 7 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 1 8 KD (Christian Democrats) 18 9 Other party 6 10 Can't say 78 SYSMISS 343 [k5] (IF K3=YES) Do you feel very close to this party, somewhat close or not very close? (IF K3=YES) Do you feel very close to this party, somewhat close or not very close? 658 1 4 2.03 .664 1 Very close 118 2 Somewhat close 416 3 Not very close 108 4 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 16 SYSMISS 343 [k6a] I think voting is a civic duty I think voting is a civic duty 1001 1 5 1.34 .702 1 Strongly agree 759 2 Agree 178 3 Disagree 35 4 Strongly disagree 25 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 4 [k6b] Important national issues should more often be decided by a referendum Important national issues should more often be decided by a referendum 1001 1 5 2.10 1.011 1 Strongly agree 316 2 Agree 391 3 Disagree 190 4 Strongly disagree 82 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 22 [k6c] I avoid people whose values, attitudes or opinions differ from my own I avoid people whose values, attitudes or opinions differ from my own 1001 1 5 3.42 .833 1 Strongly agree 30 2 Agree 118 3 Disagree 275 4 Strongly disagree 561 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 17 [k6d] Political parties are only interested in people's votes, not in their opinions Political parties are only interested in people's votes, not in their opinions 1001 1 5 2.51 1.024 1 Strongly agree 155 2 Agree 384 3 Disagree 298 4 Strongly disagree 124 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 40 [k6e] On the whole, democracy works well in Finland On the whole, democracy works well in Finland 1001 1 5 2.04 .913 1 Strongly agree 282 2 Agree 491 3 Disagree 156 4 Strongly disagree 50 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 22 [k6f] Finland should have two strong national languages, Finnish and Swedish Finland should have two strong national languages, Finnish and Swedish 1001 1 5 2.47 1.158 1 Strongly agree 277 2 Agree 226 3 Disagree 275 4 Strongly disagree 200 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 23 [k6g] Finland should put more effort into promoting a multicultural society where people tolerate foreigners of different religions and ways of life Finland should put more effort into promoting a multicultural society where people tolerate foreigners of different religions and ways of life 1001 1 5 2.16 1.021 1 Strongly agree 297 2 Agree 375 3 Disagree 221 4 Strongly disagree 84 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 24 [k6h] The second official language has to be a compulsory subject at school The second official language has to be a compulsory subject at school 1001 1 5 2.80 1.143 1 Strongly agree 182 2 Agree 202 3 Disagree 273 4 Strongly disagree 320 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 24 [k6i] Finland should allow same-sex marriage Finland should allow same-sex marriage 1001 1 5 2.54 1.384 1 Strongly agree 360 2 Agree 161 3 Disagree 117 4 Strongly disagree 308 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 55 [k6j] Finland should put more effort into creating economic equality Finland should put more effort into creating economic equality 1001 1 5 1.55 .886 1 Strongly agree 614 2 Agree 290 3 Disagree 56 4 Strongly disagree 11 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 30 [k7] Thinking about the general performance of the Government, how good or bad a job has it done over the past four years? Thinking about the general performance of the Government, how good or bad a job has it done over the past four years? 1001 1 5 2.62 .862 1 Very good job 20 2 Good job 523 3 Bad job 320 4 Very bad job 90 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 48 [k8a] To what extent do you trust the following: The President To what extent do you trust the following: The President 1001 1 5 1.95 .819 1 A lot 305 2 A fair amount 492 3 Not very much 166 4 Not at all 28 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 10 [k8b] To what extent do you trust the following: Parliament To what extent do you trust the following: Parliament 1001 1 5 2.34 .780 1 A lot 86 2 A fair amount 566 3 Not very much 292 4 Not at all 33 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 24 [k8c] To what extent do you trust the following: European Union (EU) To what extent do you trust the following: European Union (EU) 1001 1 5 2.81 .858 1 A lot 33 2 A fair amount 337 3 Not very much 460 4 Not at all 127 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 44 [k8d] To what extent do you trust the following: The Government (cabinet) To what extent do you trust the following: The Government (cabinet) 1001 1 5 2.38 .858 1 A lot 85 2 A fair amount 569 3 Not very much 268 4 Not at all 36 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 43 [k8e] To what extent do you trust the following: Political parties To what extent do you trust the following: Political parties 1001 1 5 2.69 .799 1 A lot 30 2 A fair amount 392 3 Not very much 475 4 Not at all 65 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 39 [k8f] To what extent do you trust the following: Politicians To what extent do you trust the following: Politicians 1001 1 5 2.78 .745 1 A lot 15 2 A fair amount 340 3 Not very much 526 4 Not at all 92 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 28 [k8g] To what extent do you trust the following: Judicial system To what extent do you trust the following: Judicial system 1001 1 5 1.99 .849 1 A lot 277 2 A fair amount 526 3 Not very much 151 4 Not at all 26 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 21 [k8h] To what extent do you trust the following: The police To what extent do you trust the following: The police 1001 1 5 1.56 .663 1 A lot 514 2 A fair amount 436 3 Not very much 36 4 Not at all 10 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 5 [k8i] To what extent do you trust the following: Internal revenue/taxation authorities To what extent do you trust the following: Internal revenue/taxation authorities 1001 1 5 1.87 .807 1 A lot 330 2 A fair amount 523 3 Not very much 108 4 Not at all 26 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 14 [k8j] To what extent do you trust the following: Your municipality of residence To what extent do you trust the following: Your municipality of residence 1001 1 5 1.98 .776 1 A lot 244 2 A fair amount 588 3 Not very much 136 4 Not at all 15 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 18 [k9a] Nowadays many people do not vote in elections for one reason or the other. Did you vote or not in these parliamentary elections? Nowadays many people do not vote in elections for one reason or the other. Did you vote or not in these parliamentary elections? 1001 1 3 1.12 .325 1 Yes, voted 885 2 No, did not vote 115 3 Refused to say 1 [k9b] (IF VOTED) Did you vote in advance (early voting)? (IF VOTED) Did you vote in advance (early voting)? 885 1 2 1.51 .500 1 Voted in advance 436 2 Voted on the election day 449 3 Refused to say 0 SYSMISS 116 [k10] (IF VOTED) The candidate of which party did you vote for? (IF VOTED) The candidate of which party did you vote for? 885 1 10 4.52 3.146 1 KOK (National Coalition Party) 168 2 KESK (Centre Party of Finland) 124 3 SDP (Social Democratic Party of Finland) 140 4 PS (The Finns, prev. True Finns) 102 5 VIHR (Green League) 76 6 VAS (Left Alliance) 71 7 RKP (Swedish People's Party in Finland) 4 8 KD (Christian Democrats) 32 9 Other party 10 10 Refused to say 158 SYSMISS 116 [k11] (IF VOTED) For your voting choice, which was the more important, the party or the candidate? (IF VOTED) For your voting choice, which was the more important, the party or the candidate? 885 1 3 1.61 .626 1 The party 413 2 The candidate 404 3 Can't say 68 SYSMISS 116 [k12a] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Performance of the party's representatives in election programmes on television (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Performance of the party's representatives in election programmes on television 885 1 5 3.32 .897 1 Decisive factor in my choice 37 2 Rather a lot 135 3 Somewhat 234 4 Not at all 466 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 13 SYSMISS 116 [k12b] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party looks after the interests of the occupational group I belong to (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party looks after the interests of the occupational group I belong to 885 1 5 2.87 1.093 1 Decisive factor in my choice 116 2 Rather a lot 223 3 Somewhat 226 4 Not at all 299 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 21 SYSMISS 116 [k12c] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Good party leader (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Good party leader 885 1 5 2.60 1.070 1 Decisive factor in my choice 151 2 Rather a lot 288 3 Somewhat 217 4 Not at all 219 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 10 SYSMISS 116 [k12d] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Values of the party (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Values of the party 885 1 5 1.93 .934 1 Decisive factor in my choice 344 2 Rather a lot 329 3 Somewhat 152 4 Not at all 52 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 8 SYSMISS 116 [k12e] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party has good policy on many current issues (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party has good policy on many current issues 885 1 5 2.12 .980 1 Decisive factor in my choice 256 2 Rather a lot 373 3 Somewhat 173 4 Not at all 63 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 20 SYSMISS 116 [k12f] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party has competent people to conduct politics (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party has competent people to conduct politics 885 1 5 2.13 .940 1 Decisive factor in my choice 234 2 Rather a lot 389 3 Somewhat 192 4 Not at all 52 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 18 SYSMISS 116 [k12g] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Performance of the party during the past parliamentary term (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Performance of the party during the past parliamentary term 885 1 5 2.66 1.016 1 Decisive factor in my choice 100 2 Rather a lot 327 3 Somewhat 265 4 Not at all 161 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 32 SYSMISS 116 [k12h] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party's successful election campaign (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Party's successful election campaign 885 1 5 3.09 1.012 1 Decisive factor in my choice 70 2 Rather a lot 176 3 Somewhat 268 4 Not at all 342 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 29 SYSMISS 116 [k12i] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: In my opinion, the leader of this party is the best candidate to become prime minister (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: In my opinion, the leader of this party is the best candidate to become prime minister 885 1 5 2.90 1.180 1 Decisive factor in my choice 149 2 Rather a lot 181 3 Somewhat 203 4 Not at all 315 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 37 SYSMISS 116 [k12j] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Desire to influence which parties will be in the coalition government (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Desire to influence which parties will be in the coalition government 885 1 5 2.38 1.141 1 Decisive factor in my choice 243 2 Rather a lot 266 3 Somewhat 207 4 Not at all 139 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 30 SYSMISS 116 [k12k] (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Desire to protest against the way things are going these days (IF VOTED) To what extent did the following influence your choice of party in these elections: Desire to protest against the way things are going these days 885 1 5 2.93 1.176 1 Decisive factor in my choice 156 2 Rather a lot 154 3 Somewhat 200 4 Not at all 350 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 25 SYSMISS 116 [t4] The respondent's level of education The respondent's level of education 1001 1 8 4.16 1.864 1 Primary education 94 2 Lower secondary education 98 3 Short vocational training (vocational school or course) 248 4 Upper secondary education (general) 107 5 Vocational college (post-secondary) 155 6 Polytechnic or lower academic degree (B.A. or equivalent) 171 7 Higher academic degree, M.A. or equivalent or higher 125 8 Refused to say 3 [t5] Would you describe yourself as... Would you describe yourself as... 1001 1 5 2.57 .955 1 Not at all religious 180 2 Not very religious 212 3 Somewhat religious 471 4 Very religious 130 5 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 8 [t6] The respondent's economic activity and occupational status The respondent's economic activity and occupational status 1001 1 11 5.29 2.423 1 Higher managerial employee 44 2 Lower managerial/professional employee 93 3 Intermediate level employee (clerical, technical, admin.) 116 4 Worker 242 5 Entrepreneur, self-employed, own account worker 76 6 Farmer 20 7 Student 84 8 Pensioner/Retired 295 9 Housewife/house husband, homemaker 10 10 Something else 20 11 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 1 [t7] The respondent's living arrangements The respondent's living arrangements 1001 1 6 3.03 .933 1 Living with parents 31 2 Living alone 266 3 Living with partner/spouse 402 4 Living with partner/spouse and children 262 5 Living with children as single parent 28 6 Other (SPONTANEOUS) 12 7 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 0 [t8] The respondent's employment status The respondent's employment status 1001 1 6 2.80 1.896 1 Full-time employment 475 2 Part-time employment 76 3 Unemployed 36 4 Laid-off 6 5 Not in employment for other reasons 404 6 Refused to say (SPONTANEOUS) 4 [t9] How would you describe your household's financial circumstances at the moment? How would you describe your household's financial circumstances at the moment? 1001 1 6 2.45 .936 1 I am/we are affluent 105 2 I/we manage quite well 499 3 I/we manage, if I/we shop with care 284 4 Sometimes I am/we are short of something 74 5 I am/we are short of nearly everything 33 6 Can't say (SPONTANEOUS) 6 [t10] Which language(s) are usually spoken at your home? Which language(s) are usually spoken at your home? 1001 1 5 1.22 .743 1 Only Finnish 920 2 Only Swedish 1 3 Finnish and Swedish 26 4 Finnish and some other language 53 5 Swedish and some other language 1 6 Only languages other than Finnish or Swedish 0 [t11] How good is your knowledge of Swedish? How good is your knowledge of Swedish? 1001 1 5 3.39 1.043 1 Very good 45 2 Good 126 3 Satisfactory 387 4 Bad 279 5 I don't know Swedish at all 164 6 Can't say 0 [t12] Thinking about the language(s) spoken in your neighbourhood, which of the following describes your neighbourhood? Thinking about the language(s) spoken in your neighbourhood, which of the following describes your neighbourhood? 1001 1 5 1.24 .552 1 Finnish-speaking 797 2 Bilingual with Finnish as the majority language 183 3 Bilingual with Swedish as the majority language 13 4 Swedish-speaking 0 5 Can't say 8 [t13_1] (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Finnish (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Finnish 610 0 1 .99 .081 0 Not mentioned 4 1 Mentioned 606 SYSMISS 391 [t13_2] (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Swedish (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Swedish 610 0 1 .26 .438 0 Not mentioned 453 1 Mentioned 157 SYSMISS 391 [t13_3] (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: English (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: English 610 0 1 .48 .500 0 Not mentioned 319 1 Mentioned 291 SYSMISS 391 [t13_4] (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Some other language (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Some other language 610 0 1 .10 .300 0 Not mentioned 549 1 Mentioned 61 SYSMISS 391 [t13_5] (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Can't say (IF T6=7 OR T8=1 OR T8=2) Which language(s) is/are used in your workplace or studies: Can't say 610 0 1 .00 .040 0 Not mentioned 609 1 Mentioned 1 SYSMISS 391 [t15] The respondent's municipality of residence The respondent's municipality of residence 1001 5 992 413.24 291.784 [maakunta] Region (NUTS3) of residence Region (NUTS3) of residence 1001 1 19 7.45 5.952 1 Uusimaa 271 2 Finland proper (Varsinais-Suomi) 91 4 Satakunta 43 5 Tavastia proper (Kanta-Häme) 35 6 Pirkanmaa 89 7 Päijänne Tavastia (Päijät-Häme) 36 8 Kymenlaakso 36 9 South Karelia (Etelä-Karjala) 22 10 Southern Savonia (Etelä-Savo) 37 11 Northern Savonia (Pohjois-Savo) 46 12 North Karelia (Pohjois-Karjala) 36 13 Central Finland (Keski-Suomi) 51 14 Southern Ostrobothnia (Etelä-Pohjanmaa) 49 15 Ostrobothnia (Pohjanmaa) 22 16 Central Ostrobothnia (Keski-Pohjanmaa) 14 17 Northern Ostrobothnia (Pohjois-Pohjanmaa) 72 18 Kainuu 19 19 Lapland 32 21 Åland 0 [kryh] Degree of urbanisation of the municipality of residence Degree of urbanisation of the municipality of residence 1001 1 4 2.29 .942 1 Capital area 182 2 Urban municipality 506 3 Densely populated municipality 154 4 Rural municipality 159 [nuts2] Major region (NUTS2) of residence Major region (NUTS2) of residence 1001 1 5 2.73 1.399 1 Uusimaa 271 2 Southern Finland 220 3 Eastern Finland 138 4 Western Finland 254 5 Northern Finland 118 [vpiiri] The respondent's electoral district The respondent's electoral district 1001 1 14 6.42 4.225 1 Helsinki 107 2 Uusimaa 164 3 Finland proper 91 4 Satakunta 43 5 Tavastia 71 6 Pirkanmaa 89 7 Kymi 58 8 Southern Savonia 37 9 Northern Savonia 46 10 North Karelia 36 11 Vaasa 85 12 Central Finland 51 13 Oulu 91 14 Lapland 32 [weight] Weight variable Weight variable 1001 3549.22 5167.54 4264.3688 321.05712