FSD2696 Rural Finland 2011: Business ExecutivesDetailed description (collection | citation | publications)
Hellström, Eeva (Finnish Innovation Fund (Sitra). Landmarks Programme)
Hirvola, Päivi (Finnish Innovation Fund (Sitra). Landmarks Programme)
Pesola, Inkeri (MTT Agrifood Research Finland)
Rantamäki-Lahtinen, Leena (MTT Agrifood Research Finland)
Vesala, Kari (University of Helsinki)
Vihinen, Hilkka (MTT Agrifood Research Finland)
Keywords: businesses, countryside, rural areas, rural economics, rural environment, rural migration, rural planning, rural policy
The survey studied opinions on economic life and business opportunities in rural areas in Finland. The respondents were top-level managers of Finnish enterprises. The barometer was developed for the Landmarks Programme carried out by the Finnish Innovation Fund (Sitra).
First, the respondents were asked to what extent they connected certain qualities and issues to countryside and to urban areas (e.g. burden on the public economy, environmental-friendly way of life, freedom, social exclusion, good life, authenticity). Images of the countryside were charted by asking what kinds of places corresponded to their view of the countryside and which areas they saw as part of the countryside (e.g. holiday villages in rural areas, rural population centres, nature areas, rural areas dominated by agricultural areas). The experience of urban/rural identity was examined with questions on whether they thought themselves as city or rural residents and the importance of this identity to themselves and Finns in general. The respondents were asked in what kind of a neighbourhood their homes, holiday homes and workplaces were located and in what kind of a neighbourhood they preferred to live.
The respondents were also asked about their habits of spending time in different neighbourhoods during their working time, weekends and holidays. Views were probed on the intentions to move to a more urban or rural setting within the following ten years. Reasons for the importance of different places (e.g. friends in other regions, spending holidays) were studied.
The respondents were presented with a number of statements relating to the countryside, its image and future development and significance. Some questions covered what the respondents would like the countryside to be like in 2025, what countryside meant to them at the time of the survey and what they believed it would mean to them in ten years' time. Further questions explored the respondents' beliefs about whether the significance of rural areas would grow or diminish in Finland.
Some questions investigated what kind of business ventures they thought could have potential in the countryside (e.g. logistics services, organic production, renewable energy production), and to what extent they agreed with a number of statements related to entrepreneurship both in general and in the countryside. Finally, the respondents were asked about their own business and its relation to the Finnish countryside and Finland.
Background variables included the respondent's year of birth, gender, education, political party choice if the parliamentary elections were held at that time, occupational status, annual gross income of the household, region (NUTS3) and municipality type as well as the number of employees in the respondent's enterprise, neighbourhood type of the enterprise headquarters, industrial sector and revenue of the enterprise.