[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
FSD
-
FSD3067 2
-
FNES Data Element Concept Groups 3
-
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all 2
- [fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
- [fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
FNES Data Element Concepts
-
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all 2
- [fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
- [fnes314] In the following, some propositions relating to the future direction of Finland are listed. What is your opinion on these propositions? More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
Name
fnes314
Label
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
Comparability Class
Study Design
Comparability Notes
Only in FNES3 and FNES4. In FNES3 the question was asked in the follow-up questionnaire, while in FNES4 it was presented in the main questionnaire.
Dataset | Variable | Valid | Invalid | Min | First Quartile | Median | Third Quartile | Max | Mean | StdDev |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSD2653 | P2_5 | 794 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
FSD3067 | K17_18 | 1587 | 0 | 10 | ||||||
FSD2653
|
FSD3067
|
|
---|---|---|
A very bad proposition | ||
Neither good nor bad a proposition | ||
A very good proposition | ||
1 | ||
2 | ||
3 | ||
4 | ||
6 | ||
7 | ||
8 | ||
9 |
-
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
FSD2653 - P2_5
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
-
[fnes314] On a scale of 0 to 10, how would you rate the following propositions about what Finland should focus on: More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
FSD3067 - K17_18
[fnes314] In the following, some propositions relating to the future direction of Finland are listed. What is your opinion on these propositions? More eco-friendly Finland, even if it meant low economic growth or no growth at all
-
-